<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Focus Stacking &#8212; Techniques for Increasing Depth of Field	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.psri.us/focus-stacking-techniques-for-increasing-depth-of-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.psri.us/focus-stacking-techniques-for-increasing-depth-of-field/</link>
	<description>Best Photography in New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary Doo		</title>
		<link>https://www.psri.us/focus-stacking-techniques-for-increasing-depth-of-field/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Doo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psri.us/?p=2756#comment-472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#060;&#062;

Who said digital saves money and time?  Such a joke, isn&#039;t it?  I&#039;ll probably stick with old methods for depth of field - or the lack of it  -for now until something better-and-improved comes up.  I&#039;d spend more of my retirement time doing nothing - oops, I mean on photography!  Hahhahaha!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>Who said digital saves money and time?  Such a joke, isn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;ll probably stick with old methods for depth of field &#8211; or the lack of it  -for now until something better-and-improved comes up.  I&#8217;d spend more of my retirement time doing nothing &#8211; oops, I mean on photography!  Hahhahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
